Vitalik: The key to Ethereum's long-term sustainable development lies in protocol simplicity and a "garbage collection" mechanism
BlockBeats News, January 18th, Ethereum founder Vitalik posted, stating, "An important aspect of 'trustlessness,' 'escape-hatch-freeness,' and 'sovereignty,' which has long been underestimated, is the simplicity of the protocol. Even if a protocol is super decentralized, with hundreds of thousands of nodes, and has 49% Byzantine fault tolerance, where nodes use quantum-secure peerda and stark to fully validate everything, but if the protocol is a clumsy mess composed of hundreds of thousands of lines of code and five forms of cryptic doctorate-level cryptography, ultimately the protocol will fail to pass all three tests: not fully trustless, not fully sovereign, and not very secure."
One concern I have about Ethereum protocol development is that we may be too eager to add new features to meet specific needs, even if these features make the protocol bloated, or introduce entirely new interactive components or complex cryptographic technologies as key dependencies. This may bring short-term feature upgrades, but it will severely compromise the protocol's long-term sovereignty. The core issue is that if we measure protocol changes based on "how much change to the existing protocol," then to maintain backward compatibility, adding functions will far outnumber removing functions, and the protocol will inevitably become bloated over time. To address this issue, Ethereum's development process needs a clear "simplify" / "garbage collection" mechanism.
We hope that client developers will no longer have to deal with all old versions of the Ethereum protocol. This can be left to older version clients running in Docker containers to handle. In the long run, I hope that Ethereum's pace of change will slow down. I think, for various reasons, this is ultimately inevitable. The initial fifteen years should be seen as a growth stage, where we explored many ideas and observed which ones were effective, which were useful, and which were not. We should strive to prevent those useless parts from becoming a permanent drag on the Ethereum protocol."
You may also like

The Power of Agency: The Agentic Wallet and the Next Decade of Wallets

Understanding x402 and MPP in One Article: Two Routes for Agent Payments

Particle Founder: The entrepreneurial insights I have gained the most from in the past year

Huang Renxun's latest podcast transcript: The future of Nvidia, the development of embodied intelligence and agents, the explosion of inference demand, and the public relations crisis of artificial intelligence

OKX Ventures Research Report: AI Agent Economic Infrastructure Research Report (Part 1)

The migration of settlement rights: B18 and the institutional starting point of on-chain banks

From Tencent and Circle: Looking at the Simple and Difficult Questions of Investment

The second half of stablecoins no longer belongs to the crypto circle

Cursor "Shell" Kimi Controversy Reversed: From Copyright Infringement Allegations to Authorized Collaboration, China's Open Source Model Once Again Becomes a Global AI Foundation

The Real Reason Tokens Don't Sell: 90% of Crypto Projects Overlook Investor Relations

Is the income of pump.fun real, earning a million dollars a day despite the market downturn?

The real reason why tokens are not selling: 90% of crypto projects neglect investor relations

Who is the true winner of the "Tokenization" narrative?

Moss: The Era of AI-Traded by Anyone | Project Introduction

Chip Smuggling Case Exposes Regulatory Loophole | Rewire News Evening Update

How a Structured AI Crypto Trading Bot Won at the WEEX Hackathon
Ritmex demonstrates how disciplined risk control and structured signals can make an AI crypto trading bot more stable and reliable on WEEX, highlighting the importance of combining execution discipline with scalable AI trading systems.

Old Indicator Fails, Three Major New Signals Emerge: BTC True Bottom May Still Be Below $60K
