Token Design Dilemma and Solution: Shifting from Incentive Mechanism to Demand-Driven
Original Article Title: Your token sucks (and everybody cares)
Original Article Author: @CaesarJulius0, Co-Founder of StableJack xyz
Original Article Translation: zhouzhou, BlockBeats
Editor's Note: This article analyzes the main issues with current token design, including liquidity mining, no-barrier airdrops, high FDV low circulation, and a lack of revenue sharing or value accrual mechanisms. Excessive incentives and unreasonable token releases have led to market dilution and price declines, lacking long-term value creation. To address these issues, a demand-based unlocking plan is proposed, emphasizing that tokens should be sold at a discounted price to truly committed users and ensuring the token's long-term value and market demand through revenue sharing and value accrual.
The following is the original content (slightly reorganized for readability):
This cycle is frustrating, and the old tricks no longer work. Your favorite coin no longer does a 10x in a month, or even keeps lagging every day (ETH, you know).
If you're a project team, it's even more painful. You've poured your heart into building a product, received excellent feedback from the testnet users, and after the TGE... no one cares anymore. Why? Because the token didn't pump.
Macro-economics and marketing are indeed important, but we must face reality: does your token really have a reason to rise? Is your tokenomics sound, or are you repeating those proven invalid patterns? When everyone would rather hold meme coins than touch your meme coin, should we rethink token design?
This article will dissect the main issues in current token design and propose a new approach.
Inherent Problems in Token Design
· Token Inflation – Liquidity Mining
· Continuous Selling Pressure – No-barrier Airdrops
· High FDV Low Circulation
· No Revenue Distribution or Value Reinvestment Mechanism
Simply put, most investors care about token price, not technology. They invest in the project team, hoping these tech geeks will realize the vision. In the end, both sides should win – investors should at least get a reasonable return, and the project team can focus on development.
Next, we will break down these issues one by one:
Liquidity Mining
Any legitimate project should not aimlessly distribute tokens without a plan. You wouldn't see Tesla giving away stocks to people buying cars, so why do some DeFi protocols treat tokens as freebies?
Tokens should have value, but many teams have been guilty of excessive "incentive" issuance, leading to a market oversaturation. If the project team doesn't value the token themselves, how can investors be expected to? This creates a vicious cycle: token recipients only sell instead of holding long-term.
Liquidity mining is one of the main causes of meme coin crashes. When designed improperly, it triggers a "race to the bottom": new users come in to mine, earn rewards, sell off, then move on to the next project, leaving behind only the losing old users. Without a mechanism to ensure long-term value creation, this situation will not change.
No-Threshold Airdrops
Airdrops themselves are not the issue, but most airdrops fail to bring in long-term users. The problem is not just that recipients sell off, but that many airdrop models only reward short-term "task-based" behavior rather than genuine user engagement.
The typical process looks like this:
· Participants (usually bounty hunters) complete some basic tasks to qualify for the airdrop.
· The protocol distributes tokens at TGE.
· Many recipients immediately cash out.
· The token crashes, making it difficult for the protocol to retain users.
Sound familiar? The real issue lies in misaligned incentives—airdrop recipients have no reason to stay, not because the product lacks value, but because the airdrop itself does not consider long-term engagement.
Not all projects should do airdrops, and for those that should, airdrops should reward genuinely active users, not just one-time task completers.
Hyperliquid and Kaito are great examples. Their airdrops do not incentivize manipulation but rather align with users' existing behavior—Hyperliquid rewards active traders, Kaito rewards authors contributing quality content consistently. This not only promotes genuine participation but also increases long-term holding rates, redirecting funds away from short-term arbitrageurs.
High FDV, Low Circulation
Many projects raised a huge amount of early-stage funding for development, and early investors want to recoup their investment quickly. This results in a high FDV (fully diluted valuation) but a low circulating supply, causing the token price to be severely inflated at listing.
The issue is that a high FDV limits the upside for early retail holders, as most tokens are locked up in the hands of institutional investors whose cost basis is far below the market price. Once the unlocking begins, these early investors often cash out under market demand pressure, causing a continuous downward price pressure. Eventually, the token price drops, and everyone starts to worry.
This is not a perfect solution, but for projects with high FDV, there must be strong fundamentals and real market demand; otherwise, they will merely become a "buy the dip" fund for early investors.
No Revenue Sharing or Value Accrual
Now, let's talk about the most critical issue: Why should your token exist?
If it has no revenue sharing, no value accrual, and no practical utility, then why would anyone hold it long term? If your token is merely a speculative alternative, it will inevitably trend towards zero; it's just a matter of time.
Many founders avoid revenue sharing to maintain full control over profits, which is understandable. However, if there is not a compelling reason for users to hold it, the market will price the token accordingly. Ultimately, value accrual is not optional. Whether through revenue sharing, real earnings, or meaningful in-protocol utility, the token must provide a valid reason for its existence.
Relying solely on "governance" is not a solution. Most governance tokens have no real power, and even if investors do decide on a particular pattern, it almost always relates to toggling a fee switch—a notion still tied to revenue sharing.
The MetaDEX model has done reasonably well by providing revenue sharing to token stakers (such as Aerodrome, Pharaoh, and Shadow Exchange). This enables them to create demand for the token and increase the staking ratio.
So, what is the solution? My solution is simple: a demand-driven unlock schedule.
Tokens should not be released on a fixed schedule but should only enter circulation when there is actual demand from active protocol users. Additionally, tokens should not be freely distributed through liquidity mining rewards but should be available for purchase at a discounted price, ensuring that only users truly invested in the protocol can become holders. Here are three industry leaders who have proposed similar solutions:
Luigi DeMeo also holds a similar view, emphasizing that most token models face runaway inflation issues, weakening value accrual. He notes that liquidity mining often attracts short-term participants who immediately sell tokens, depleting protocol resources, and cannot ensure long-term engagement. Without market-driven demand and revenue sharing, token holders can hardly see real value.
Vitalik Buterin tweeted that protocols should consider discounted sales instead of free token giveaways, which also supports the main point of this article.
Andre Cronje directly raised this issue. He believes that liquidity mining attracts temporary participants who mine for rewards and then exit once the incentive is gone, creating sustained selling pressure. As a solution, he proposed the "optionality reward" — whereby liquidity providers can purchase tokens at a discounted price after a set period, rather than receiving tokens for free. This mechanism aligns their incentives with the project's long-term success, as their reward only appreciates when the protocol thrives.
At Stable Jack, we are implementing a solution called Discount Tickets — a system designed to make token distribution sustainable, demand-driven, and resistant to rent-seeking capital.
How it works:
Only active users can acquire Discount Tickets, granting them the right to buy $JACK at a discounted price relative to the market.
The protocol does not give away tokens for free — they are sold at a discounted price, ensuring committed users can accumulate a meaningful holding.
No new tokens will enter circulation unless there is genuine demand for $JACK — this is demand-driven unlocking.
There is no undue supply pressure — loyal users will not be dumped on by short-term participants.
What is the result? Believers, not mercenaries, become holders. There is no runaway inflation. No free giveaways. Just a model that prioritizes user alignment and protocol longevity. Additionally, the protocol can build up its own liquidity, alleviate selling pressure, and continue product development.
Conclusion
For years, altcoins have struggled under imperfect token models — unsustainable liquidity mining, structurally flawed airdrops, and runaway inflation have eroded value without creating value. The solution is not to remove incentives but to align incentives with long-term participation and actual value accrual.
We need to shift from time-based unlocking to demand-based unlocking, ensuring tokens only enter circulation when there is genuine market demand. Projects should not give away tokens for free but should sell them at a discounted price to committed users, while also incorporating a revenue-sharing mechanism that gives holders a meaningful stake in the protocol's success.
You may also like

February 9th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

After being questioned by Vitalik, L2s are collectively saying goodbye to the "cheap" era
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Paris Workshop Reveals: How Retail Crypto Traders Can Outperform Hedge Funds
Witness how WEEX's Paris AI Trading Hackathon revealed AI's edge over human traders. Explore key strategies, live competition results & how to build your own AI trading bot.

U.S. Oil (USOR) Price Prediction 2026–2030
Key Takeaways U.S. Oil (USOR) is a speculative Solana-based crypto project that aims to index the United States…

USOR Surges on Meme Narrative Despite No Real-World Asset Backing
Key Takeaways: USOR, a Solana-based token, has seen a notable surge driven by speculative narratives rather than verifiable…

How to Buy U.S. Oil Reserve (USOR) Cryptocurrency
Key Takeaways U.S. Oil Reserve (USOR) is a Solana-based token primarily traded on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). Claims have…

USOR vs Oil ETFs: Understanding Why the ‘Oil Reserve’ Token Doesn’t Track Crude Prices
Key Takeaways The U.S. Oil Reserve (USOR) token has become noteworthy for its claims, yet it does not…

Trend Research Reduces Ether Holdings After Major Market Turbulence
Key Takeaways: Trend Research has significantly cut down its Ether holdings, moving over 404,000 ETH to exchanges recently.…

Investors Channel $258M into Crypto Startups Despite $2 Trillion Market Sell-Off
Key Takeaways: Investors pumped approximately $258 million into crypto startups in early February, highlighting continued support for blockchain-related…

NBA Star Giannis Antetokounmpo Becomes Shareholder in Prediction Market Kalshi
Key Takeaways: Giannis Antetokounmpo, the NBA’s two-time MVP, invests in the prediction market platform Kalshi as a shareholder.…

Arizona Home Invasion Targets $66 Million in Cryptocurrency: Two Teens Charged
Key Takeaways Two teenagers from California face serious felony charges for allegedly attempting to steal $66 million in…

El Salvador’s Bukele Approval Reaches Record 91.9% Despite Limited Bitcoin Use
Key Takeaways: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele enjoys a record high approval rating of 91.9% from his populace,…

Crypto Price Prediction for February 6: XRP, Dogecoin, and Shiba Inu’s Market Movements
Key Takeaways: The crypto market experienced a notable shift with Bitcoin’s significant surge, impacting altcoins like XRP, Dogecoin,…

China Restricts Unapproved Yuan-Pegged Stablecoins to Maintain Currency Stability
Key Takeaways: China’s central bank and seven government agencies have banned the issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins abroad without…

Solana Price Prediction: $80 SOL Looks Scary – But Smart Money Just Signaled This Might Be the Bottom
Key Takeaways Despite Solana’s descent to $80, some traders find security as smart money enters the fray, suggesting…

XRP Price Prediction: Major Ledger Upgrade Quietly Activated – Why This Could Be the Most Bullish Signal Yet
Key Takeaways: The activation of the Permissioned Domains amendment on XRPL represents a significant development in XRP’s potential…

Dogecoin Price Prediction: Death Cross Confirmed as DOGE Falls Below $0.10 – Is DOGE Reaching Zero?
Key Takeaways The death cross event signals potential bearish trends for Dogecoin as its price dips under $0.10,…

Stablecoin Inflows Have Doubled to $98B Amid Selling Pressure
Key Takeaways Stablecoin inflows to crypto exchanges have surged to $98 billion, doubling previous levels amidst heightened market…
February 9th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?
After being questioned by Vitalik, L2s are collectively saying goodbye to the "cheap" era
WEEX AI Trading Hackathon Paris Workshop Reveals: How Retail Crypto Traders Can Outperform Hedge Funds
Witness how WEEX's Paris AI Trading Hackathon revealed AI's edge over human traders. Explore key strategies, live competition results & how to build your own AI trading bot.
U.S. Oil (USOR) Price Prediction 2026–2030
Key Takeaways U.S. Oil (USOR) is a speculative Solana-based crypto project that aims to index the United States…
USOR Surges on Meme Narrative Despite No Real-World Asset Backing
Key Takeaways: USOR, a Solana-based token, has seen a notable surge driven by speculative narratives rather than verifiable…
How to Buy U.S. Oil Reserve (USOR) Cryptocurrency
Key Takeaways U.S. Oil Reserve (USOR) is a Solana-based token primarily traded on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). Claims have…