Protect Developers or Weaken Oversight? Judiciary Committee Strongly Opposes Section 604 of the CLARITY Act
BlockBeats News, January 17th, the chairman of the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee stated in a letter to the Senate Banking Committee that the "Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act" would weaken federal fund transfer regulation and should not be included in cryptocurrency market structure legislation.
The Judiciary Committee's Republican chairman, Chuck Grassley, and chief Democratic member, Dick Durbin, wrote in the letter that Section 604 of the Banking Committee's market structure bill - aimed at protecting software developers from criminal liability for third-party misuse of their products - would "weaken" federal law regarding unlicensed money transmission. "The Senate Judiciary Committee (which has jurisdiction over Title 18 of the U.S. Code) was not consulted, nor was it afforded the opportunity for advance substantive consideration of the proposed changes."
The letter cited the case of the Department of Justice's prosecution of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm, stating that the case demonstrated that the prosecuting party had sufficiently argued the importance of existing regulations holding parties to unlicensed money transmission accountable. This letter is another blow to the market structure bill, with the Senate Banking Committee originally scheduled to debate and vote on the bill on Thursday but canceling the agenda on Wednesday night in the face of increasingly strong opposition.
If the provision is retained in the bill, the Judiciary Committee (responsible for legal matters) would need to sign off as the third committee on the overall package, and this latest controversy suggests that the legislative process may become even more complicated. DeFi advocates insist that without these specific protection provisions, they may withdraw their support, signaling another difficult deadlock.
The letter emphasized: "Therefore, we urge the committee to reject any proposed provisions that would weaken the government's ability to hold parties accountable for unlicensed money transmission, including Section 604."
You may also like

Understanding x402 and MPP in One Article: Two Routes for Agent Payments

Particle Founder: The entrepreneurial insights I have gained the most from in the past year

Huang Renxun's latest podcast transcript: The future of Nvidia, the development of embodied intelligence and agents, the explosion of inference demand, and the public relations crisis of artificial intelligence

OKX Ventures Research Report: AI Agent Economic Infrastructure Research Report (Part 1)

The migration of settlement rights: B18 and the institutional starting point of on-chain banks

From Tencent and Circle: Looking at the Simple and Difficult Questions of Investment

The second half of stablecoins no longer belongs to the crypto circle

Cursor "Shell" Kimi Controversy Reversed: From Copyright Infringement Allegations to Authorized Collaboration, China's Open Source Model Once Again Becomes a Global AI Foundation

The Real Reason Tokens Don't Sell: 90% of Crypto Projects Overlook Investor Relations

Is the income of pump.fun real, earning a million dollars a day despite the market downturn?

The real reason why tokens are not selling: 90% of crypto projects neglect investor relations

Who is the true winner of the "Tokenization" narrative?

Moss: The Era of AI-Traded by Anyone | Project Introduction

Chip Smuggling Case Exposes Regulatory Loophole | Rewire News Evening Update

How a Structured AI Crypto Trading Bot Won at the WEEX Hackathon
Ritmex demonstrates how disciplined risk control and structured signals can make an AI crypto trading bot more stable and reliable on WEEX, highlighting the importance of combining execution discipline with scalable AI trading systems.

Old Indicator Fails, Three Major New Signals Emerge: BTC True Bottom May Still Be Below $60K

Meeting OpenClaw Founder at a Hackathon: What Else Can Lobsters Do?
