Bitcoin & Ethereum ETFs Shed Over $1Billion, Solana and XRP Attract Inflows

By: crypto insight|2026/01/29 19:00:01
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs experienced substantial outflows exceeding $1 billion in just one day, reflecting a shift during market volatility.
  • Solana and XRP ETFs, in contrast, saw net inflows, highlighting varying institutional strategies amidst fluctuating markets.
  • After three consecutive outflow days, Bitcoin’s trading volume dipped, paralleling broader market uncertainties.
  • Despite outflows, Ethereum ETFs maintained assets close to $18.3 billion, about 5% of Ethereum’s total market cap.
  • Market responses suggest positioning rather than fundamentals, with macro-rebalancing driving Bitcoin and Ethereum’s ETF shifts.

WEEX Crypto News, 2026-01-29 07:56:29

The world of cryptocurrency is never static, consistently reflecting both dramatic market dynamics and subtle investment shifts. The recent activity in exchange-traded funds (ETFs) tied to Bitcoin and Ethereum serves as a palpable testament to the volatility characteristic of digital assets, with sizable withdrawals marking a turn in investor sentiment. On a single day, January 21, investors moved out of these leading cryptocurrencies, causing substantial outflows that surpassed the staggering $1 billion mark. While Bitcoin and Ethereum were retreating, Ethereum’s competitor altcoin-linked products such as Solana and XRP recorded net inflows, suggesting a strategic divergence in institutional investment amidst the market turmoil.

Bitcoin ETFs: A Massive Exodus in Times of Global Market Rally

The withdrawals from Bitcoin ETFs reached unprecedented levels, marking the largest one-day redemption since the high redemptions seen in November. A contributing factor was the shift in the broader market, where risk assets reversed course owing to more stable geopolitical conditions. Remarks from U.S. President Donald Trump at the World Economic Forum in Davos conveyed a possible easing of military tensions over Greenland and the suspension of tariffs on Europe, fostering a positive effect on global equities across the U.S., Europe, and Asia. Such geopolitical shifts often influence investor behavior in cryptocurrencies, underscoring how traditional global events impact digital asset markets.

The largest Bitcoin ETF outflow was noted in the iShares Bitcoin Trust at BlackRock, which reported exiting funds amounting to $356.64 million. Following closely was Fidelity’s FBTC, losing $287.67 million. Grayscale’s GBTC, although not affected at the level of its counterparts, continued to see withdrawals, cumulatively accounting for more than $25 billion since its conversion. Not all Bitcoin ETFs suffered; the HODL ETF contrasted the trend by recording a net inflow of $6.35 million, showcasing that not all investors shied away from Bitcoin holding through ETFs during this tumultuous period.

At the close of this reported interval, despite the overall market pullback, January slightly leans towards positive net inflows overall, tallying up to $17.56 million. With Bitcoin trading at around $89,100 and declining by nearly 7% in the preceding week, the trading volume appeared to be thinning, signaling low short-term activity and highlighting the investors’ cautious stance towards potential short-term market developments.

Ethereum ETFs Face Similar Selling Pressure

Ethereum, sharing the spotlight with Bitcoin, faced its own investor skepticism. January 21 registered net outflows amounting to approximately $297.51 million from spot Ethereum ETFs, perpetuating the prior day’s heavy withdrawals. The primary withdrawals were attributed to BlackRock’s ETHA which managed to offload over $250 million. Fidelity’s FETH and Grayscale’s ETHE similarly observed reductions, with only a minimal reduction in the average Ethereum ETF size showcasing an evident investor pullback. Notably, Grayscale’s lower-fee Ethereum mini trust recorded a minor inflow, indicating some investor resilience and faith in Ethereum’s long-term potential despite current volatility.

Ethereum ETFs, though affected by outflows, still harbor significant value of close to $18.3 billion in assets, representing roughly 5% of the cryptocurrency’s market capitalization. Ethereum had temporarily crossed the $3,000 boundary before revisiting lower valuations, trading near $2,900, and exhibited a 13% drop across the preceding week. These movements paint a broader picture of Ethereum’s investor landscape, linking asset valuations directly to ETF activities and large-scale investor sentiment.

The Attraction of Solana and XRP Amid ETF Turbulence

Amid the selloff surrounding Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, Solana and XRP saw a contrasting capitalization. Solana ETFs noted a net inflow of $2.92 million on January 21, gathering cumulative inflows nearing $870 million. This suggests continued interest, prompted by existing backing from established firms such as Fidelity, VanEck, and Grayscale. Despite SOL experiencing an 11% value drop in the week, the attraction to its ETFs remained consistent, highlighting the market’s nuanced perspective towards Solana as a feasible alternative investment route during crypto storms.

Similarly, XRP ETFs rallied with net inflows of $7.16 million after opening the week with outflows. Since inception, XRP ETFs have amassed a cumulative inflow total of $1.23 billion, dictating a robust ETF asset value around $1.39 billion. Contributions from significant funds like Bitwise, Franklin Templeton, and Canary Capital played pivotal roles in these inflow figures, notwithstanding XRP’s lower trading trend mirroring broader market conditions.

Positioned for the Future: Behind the ETF Movements

The divergence between Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs and those of Solana and XRP implies more than meets the eye. This discrepancy in performance is said to reflect strategic positioning rather than shifts rooted in inherent cryptocurrency fundamentals. Macro-driven rebalancing dictates the economic landscape of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, where broad market expectations and positional adjustments are nuanced amid established cryptocurrency legacies. Meanwhile, Solana and XRP funds attract streams of asset inflows amid realized price dips, pinpointing a selective inflow pattern triggered by preceding value declines, attracting long-term investors who interpret these moments as opportune entry points into the crypto ecosystem.

Addressing Common Queries

In the scope of these observations, understanding the sequential market adaptations remains crucial for investors and observers wanting to navigate this extensive financial terrain, encapsulating both risks and opportunities hosted by volatile ETF dynamics.

FAQ

What caused the massive outflows from Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs?

The outflows were primarily influenced by broader market volatility and geopolitical developments. Investor sentiment was impacted by global economic conditions and market reactions to geopolitical statements, such as those made at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Why are Solana and XRP ETFs seeing inflows while others decline?

Solana and XRP ETFs attracted inflows as investors sought alternative assets amid the downturn in traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This reflects differing strategic positions among institutional investors seeking diversification.

How did geopolitical factors impact the crypto ETF market?

Statements and geopolitical developments can cause shifts in investor sentiment, which influence market conditions and fund movements. Events such as the temporary easing of tensions reported by global leaders can result in tangible ETF market reactions, as seen with Bitcoin and Ethereum outflows.

What is the future outlook for Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs?

While Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs faced withdrawals, their long-term outlook could still be bullish based on crypto’s adoption potential. Investor interest may return as market volatility decreases and positive developments emerge within the cryptocurrency space.

Could market fluctuations impact the long-term prospects of Solana and XRP ETFs?

Yes, while current inflows suggest strength, prolonged market volatility or new regulations affecting these assets could impact their attractiveness. However, institutional interest could fortify their position as long-term investment vehicles.

In summary, market dynamics within crypto ETFs represent a mirror of broader investor sentiment, outlining a tale of divergence between dominant cryptocurrencies and their alternatives. As investors chart their strategies, they must remain attentive to the evolving market narratives that shape these shifts and guide their next decisions.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more