Base's 2025 Report Card: Revenue Grows 30X, Solidifies L2 Leadership
Original Title: Are you Based? Base's Outlook for 2026
Original Author: AJC, Messari
Original Translator: Tim, PANews
In 2025, Base further solidified its position as the Ethereum L2 leader across various performance metrics. Among these, revenue remains the most telling indicator of its dominance in the overall L2 ecosystem.

Despite a significant drop in L2's total revenue from its 2024 peak, Base continues to command a significant share of the L2 market. In December 2023, Base's on-chain revenue was $2.5 million, accounting for only 5% of L2's total revenue of $53.7 million. One year later, Base's on-chain revenue grew to $14.7 million, representing 63% of L2's total revenue of $23.5 million in December 2024. This trend persisted into 2025, with Base achieving $75.4 million in revenue year-to-date, accounting for 62% of L2's total revenue of $120.7 million.

Base's leadership is not only evident at the revenue level; its DeFi TVL has also become a frontrunner in the L2 race. After surpassing Arbitrum One in January 2025, Base's current $46.3 billion DeFi TVL accounts for 46% of the entire L2 market. Of particular note, Base's DeFi TVL share has steadily increased throughout 2025, rising from 33% at the beginning of the year to the current level.
Base's most significant advantage over other L2 solutions lies in its distribution channel, a critical advantage that speaks for itself. According to Coinbase's latest 10-Q filing, with 9.3 million monthly active trading users in the third quarter, Base can directly reach a large and onboarded user base, which is challenging for other L2 networks to achieve. While most L2s must acquire users through incentives or third-party integrations, Base, thanks to its direct connection to the largest U.S. centralized exchange, enjoys a natural distribution advantage.

Base has also stood out for the ecosystem's application of scalable development and tangible value creation. This year, applications within the Base ecosystem have generated $369.9 million in revenue. Notably, application revenue is primarily concentrated in Aerodrome, which contributed $160.5 million, accounting for 43% of total application revenue. However, the top DEX on Base was not the only successful application in 2025.
The AI Agent Launch Platform Virtuals has achieved $43.2 million in revenue, accounting for 12% of the Base ecosystem's total revenue from applications; meanwhile, the recently launched sports prediction app Football.Fun has also generated $4.7 million in revenue. These data indicate that a diverse set of revenue-generating products has been established on Base across multiple sectors, and the ecosystem's vibrancy does not rely on a single application or use case.

This distribution advantage was best exemplified in the Coinbase and Morpho collaboration case. This partnership allows Coinbase users to borrow USDC directly on the platform using cryptocurrency as collateral. While the user experience is embedded within the Coinbase website, collateral management and loan execution are carried out on-chain through Morpho deployed on Base. This lending product was launched less than a year ago, but its adoption rate has been quite high.
Coinbase users have borrowed $866.3 million through Morpho, currently representing 90% of active loans on Morpho on the Base network. Concurrently, Morpho's TVL on the Base chain has grown by 1906% over the year, surging from $48.2 million to $966.4 million. Base's distribution advantage means on-chain activity can serve as a byproduct for Coinbase's product usage. This user onboarding channel is not available to other L2 networks, leading them to rely mainly on incentive programs to attract liquidity and users to the DeFi ecosystem.

Although Base chain's DeFi TVL has continued to grow since 2025, and on-chain revenue remains stable, user on-chain behavior has started to shift. Based on daily filtered user statistics (referring to the number of unique addresses conducting at least two transactions in a specific contract in a day and spending more than 0.0001 gas), USDC has now become the most widely used application on the Base chain, with an average of 83,400 daily users in November, a 233% year-on-year increase from 25,100 users in the same period last year.
Meanwhile, retail and DEX interaction has significantly decreased. The daily filtered user count for Uniswap and Aerodrome has dropped by 74% and 49%, respectively. However, it is more noteworthy that DEX trading volume on the Base chain hit a record high in 2025, indicating that activity on Uniswap and Aerodrome is increasingly concentrated among traders with larger fund sizes and higher transaction volumes.
Base 2026 Key Initiative: Base App
Leveraging Coinbase's natural advantage, Base enjoys a luxury condition that other chains find hard to reach. It has established a solid moat in terms of user base, liquidity, and application ecosystem. Base leads in revenue on the L2 network, has the deepest DeFi TVL in the field, and continues to receive on-chain user traffic from Coinbase. In other words, unlike most L2 networks still struggling to establish themselves or attract users, Base has long surpassed this stage of development.
With this moat, Base's focus has shifted beyond core L2 network metrics to the creator economy sector. If this market opportunity is seized, the potential total market size is estimated to be close to $5 trillion. To seize this market direction, Base's core strategy is focused on the Base App. This "super app" aims to integrate asset custody, trading, social, and wallet core functions into one. Unlike most crypto wallets, the Base App features several innovative functions beyond basic asset management:
· Social feed based on Farcaster and Zora;
· Direct messaging and group chat functionality through XMTP (supporting interaction with other users and AI agents like Bankr);
· Built-in mini-app discovery feature, allowing users to directly access and use various mini-apps within the Base App.

The Base App launched an internal beta in July, initially only available to users invited through a whitelist. Nevertheless, the Base App has shown significant growth. A total of 148,400 users have created accounts, with accelerated registrations in November, seeing a 93% increase month-over-month. User retention is also strong, with 6,300 weekly active users (a 74% increase) and 10,500 monthly active users (a 7% increase). Although not explicitly confirmed, the Base App is likely to conclude its internal testing phase this month, paving the way for a full public launch before the new year.

The most critical goal of the on-chain economy Base is trying to build is to enable creators to directly profit from their created content. Content created in the Base App is tokenized by default (although users can opt out of this feature), turning each post into a tradable market. Creators can earn a share of the transaction fees generated by the content, specifically 1% of each transaction.
In the future, users will also be able to mint creator tokens for their accounts directly within the Base App, opening up another monetization avenue (this feature is currently in early testing). At a technical level, both creator tokens and content tokens are tokenized based on the Zora protocol. As of now, creators have cumulatively earned $6.1 million through Zora's tokenization model, with an average monthly payout of $1.1 million since July.

As of now, the total number of creators and content tokens tokenized through Zora has exceeded 6.52 million. Among them, 6.45 million (about 99% of the total) have failed to achieve five transactions. Only 17.8 thousand tokens (0.3% of the total) remain transactional after 48 hours of issuance.
Before interpreting this data, one must understand a fundamental fact: the vast majority of content published on the Internet is inherently worthless. From this perspective, the fact that 99% of tokens have not garnered market attention may simply reflect the natural distribution of online content, rather than a structural flaw in the Base model. What truly matters are the tokens that survive beyond 48 hours. We believe that a creator or content token being able to continue trading after 48 hours of issuance signals the genuine value of the creator or content itself.
In other words, Base has so far made little impact on the creator economy. Only 17.8 thousand creator and content tokens show ongoing activity, which is a mere drop in the ocean compared to the vast daily output of online content. Pessimists may deem this model unviable, but optimists believe that while Base has essentially achieved near-zero penetration in the creator economy, there is significant room for growth through optimizations in content distribution, content discovery, and functional tools. In any case, increasing the number of tokens that can survive beyond 48 hours should be a key focus for Base in 2026.
Lastly, Base may possess the most effective incentive mechanism in the crypto market: tokens. In September of this year, Base confirmed that it is exploring token issuance but has not yet disclosed specific details regarding allocation, utility, or potential launch dates. The most notable aspect of the Base token is not the token itself but its use cases. Unlike most L2s, Base does not rely on tokens to attract liquidity. Instead, it can use tokens to incentivize on-chain creator participation, rewarding behaviors that drive user engagement, content creation, and social activities rather than short-term trading.
In conclusion, leveraging its established L2 core ecosystem, Base is advancing through distribution channels, product coverage, and potential token incentives, exploring consumer and creator-oriented use cases. If this strategy succeeds, Base will establish a moat around the social and creator ecosystem. This moat exhibits higher user stickiness compared to DeFi TVL and stablecoin balances, areas where other L2 solutions have not yet ventured.
You may also like

Found a "meme coin" that skyrocketed in just a few days. Any tips?

TAO is Elon Musk, who invested in OpenAI, and Subnet is Sam Altman

The era of "mass coin distribution" on public chains comes to an end

Soaring 50 times, with an FDV exceeding 10 billion USD, why RaveDAO?

1 billion DOTs were minted out of thin air, but the hacker only made 230,000 dollars

After the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, when will the war end?

Before using Musk's "Western WeChat" X Chat, you need to understand these three questions
The X Chat will be available for download on the App Store this Friday. The media has already covered the feature list, including self-destructing messages, screenshot prevention, 481-person group chats, Grok integration, and registration without a phone number, positioning it as the "Western WeChat." However, there are three questions that have hardly been addressed in any reports.
There is a sentence on X's official help page that is still hanging there: "If malicious insiders or X itself cause encrypted conversations to be exposed through legal processes, both the sender and receiver will be completely unaware."
No. The difference lies in where the keys are stored.
In Signal's end-to-end encryption, the keys never leave your device. X, the court, or any external party does not hold your keys. Signal's servers have nothing to decrypt your messages; even if they were subpoenaed, they could only provide registration timestamps and last connection times, as evidenced by past subpoena records.
X Chat uses the Juicebox protocol. This solution divides the key into three parts, each stored on three servers operated by X. When recovering the key with a PIN code, the system retrieves these three shards from X's servers and recombines them. No matter how complex the PIN code is, X is the actual custodian of the key, not the user.
This is the technical background of the "help page sentence": because the key is on X's servers, X has the ability to respond to legal processes without the user's knowledge. Signal does not have this capability, not because of policy, but because it simply does not have the key.
The following illustration compares the security mechanisms of Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram, and X Chat along six dimensions. X Chat is the only one of the four where the platform holds the key and the only one without Forward Secrecy.
The significance of Forward Secrecy is that even if a key is compromised at a certain point in time, historical messages cannot be decrypted because each message has a unique key. Signal's Double Ratchet protocol automatically updates the key after each message, a mechanism lacking in X Chat.
After analyzing the X Chat architecture in June 2025, Johns Hopkins University cryptology professor Matthew Green commented, "If we judge XChat as an end-to-end encryption scheme, this seems like a pretty game-over type of vulnerability." He later added, "I would not trust this any more than I trust current unencrypted DMs."
From a September 2025 TechCrunch report to being live in April 2026, this architecture saw no changes.
In a February 9, 2026 tweet, Musk pledged to undergo rigorous security tests of X Chat before its launch on X Chat and to open source all the code.
As of the April 17 launch date, no independent third-party audit has been completed, there is no official code repository on GitHub, the App Store's privacy label reveals X Chat collects five or more categories of data including location, contact info, and search history, directly contradicting the marketing claim of "No Ads, No Trackers."
Not continuous monitoring, but a clear access point.
For every message on X Chat, users can long-press and select "Ask Grok." When this button is clicked, the message is delivered to Grok in plaintext, transitioning from encrypted to unencrypted at this stage.
This design is not a vulnerability but a feature. However, X Chat's privacy policy does not state whether this plaintext data will be used for Grok's model training or if Grok will store this conversation content. By actively clicking "Ask Grok," users are voluntarily removing the encryption protection of that message.
There is also a structural issue: How quickly will this button shift from an "optional feature" to a "default habit"? The higher the quality of Grok's replies, the more frequently users will rely on it, leading to an increase in the proportion of messages flowing out of encryption protection. The actual encryption strength of X Chat, in the long run, depends not only on the design of the Juicebox protocol but also on the frequency of user clicks on "Ask Grok."
X Chat's initial release only supports iOS, with the Android version simply stating "coming soon" without a timeline.
In the global smartphone market, Android holds about 73%, while iOS holds about 27% (IDC/Statista, 2025). Of WhatsApp's 3.14 billion monthly active users, 73% are on Android (according to Demand Sage). In India, WhatsApp covers 854 million users, with over 95% Android penetration. In Brazil, there are 148 million users, with 81% on Android, and in Indonesia, there are 112 million users, with 87% on Android.
WhatsApp's dominance in the global communication market is built on Android. Signal, with a monthly active user base of around 85 million, also relies mainly on privacy-conscious users in Android-dominant countries.
X Chat circumvented this battlefield, with two possible interpretations. One is technical debt; X Chat is built with Rust, and achieving cross-platform support is not easy, so prioritizing iOS may be an engineering constraint. The other is a strategic choice; with iOS holding a market share of nearly 55% in the U.S., X's core user base being in the U.S., prioritizing iOS means focusing on their core user base rather than engaging in direct competition with Android-dominated emerging markets and WhatsApp.
These two interpretations are not mutually exclusive, leading to the same result: X Chat's debut saw it willingly forfeit 73% of the global smartphone user base.
This matter has been described by some: X Chat, along with X Money and Grok, forms a trifecta creating a closed-loop data system parallel to the existing infrastructure, similar in concept to the WeChat ecosystem. This assessment is not new, but with X Chat's launch, it's worth revisiting the schematic.
X Chat generates communication metadata, including information on who is talking to whom, for how long, and how frequently. This data flows into X's identity system. Part of the message content goes through the Ask Grok feature and enters Grok's processing chain. Financial transactions are handled by X Money: external public testing was completed in March, opening to the public in April, enabling fiat peer-to-peer transfers via Visa Direct. A senior Fireblocks executive confirmed plans for cryptocurrency payments to go live by the end of the year, holding money transmitter licenses in over 40 U.S. states currently.
Every WeChat feature operates within China's regulatory framework. Musk's system operates within Western regulatory frameworks, but he also serves as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This is not a WeChat replica; it is a reenactment of the same logic under different political conditions.
The difference is that WeChat has never explicitly claimed to be "end-to-end encrypted" on its main interface, whereas X Chat does. "End-to-end encryption" in user perception means that no one, not even the platform, can see your messages. X Chat's architectural design does not meet this user expectation, but it uses this term.
X Chat consolidates the three data lines of "who this person is, who they are talking to, and where their money comes from and goes to" in one company's hands.
The help page sentence has never been just technical instructions.

Parse Noise's newly launched Beta version, how to "on-chain" this heat?

Is Lobster a Thing of the Past? Unpacking the Hermes Agent Tools that Supercharge Your Throughput to 100x

Declare War on AI? The Doomsday Narrative Behind Ultraman's Residence in Flames

Crypto VCs Are Dead? The Market Extinction Cycle Has Begun

Claude's Journey to Foolishness in Diagrams: The Cost of Thriftiness, or How API Bill Increased 100-Fold

Edge Land Regress: A Rehash Around Maritime Power, Energy, and the Dollar

Arthur Hayes Latest Interview: How Should Retail Investors Navigate the Iran Conflict?

Just now, Sam Altman was attacked again, this time by gunfire

Straits Blockade, Stablecoin Recap | Rewire News Morning Edition

From High Expectations to Controversial Turnaround, Genius Airdrop Triggers Community Backlash

